Climate summit deal sidesteps fossil fuels as Australia takes lead of negotiations
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-18% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
27% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : Several countries objected to the summit ending without stronger plans for reining in greenhouse gases or addressing fossil fuels.47% : A climate deal has been reached at the COP30 climate summit that does not address fossil fuels, as Australia takes charge of negotiations for the next conference.
41% : United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Executive Secretary Simon Stiell acknowledged that the deal left many frustrated.
37% : It comes as a compromise climate deal was pushed through at COP30 in Brazil that would boost finance for poor nations coping with global warming, but that omitted any mention of fossil fuels.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
