Judge Cannon 'basically inviting' Jack Smith to ask for her removal in new filing: expert
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-63% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-22% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : The move came after special counsel Jack Smith submitted an emphatic response telling Cannon that her proposed jury instructions -- that would direct jurors to consider that classified documents in the case could be considered personal property of Trump under the PRA -- were unacceptable.27% : Each scenario assumed the PRA applies to this case and provides Trump with a defense,"' wrote Vance.
25% : Watch: Jack Smith walks in stony silence as reporter tries to pry info on Trump probes On Thursday, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed Donald Trump's claim that the Presidential Records Act protects him from prosecution for taking government documents when he left office in 2021.
24% : " ALSO READ: A criminologist explains why keeping Trump from the White House is all that matters Former prosecutor Joyce Vance explained that it may appear like an effort to save face, but "Judge Cannon also vigorously denies what she characterizes as the Special Counsel's request for a final decision on jury instructions.
14% : [a charge in the Espionage Act] and makes no mention of Presidential Records Act, and specified the nature of charges against Trump adequately.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.