Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
USA Today Article Rating

Live updates: Supreme Court debates Trump's efforts to limit birthright citizenship

  • Bias Rating
  • Reliability

    80% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    50% Medium Right

  • Politician Portrayal

    -44% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

21% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : Trump, however, faced 64 injunctions during his first term.
51% : He represented Trump in last year's blockbuster case about presidential immunity. - Maureen Groppe Have the justices addressed national injunctions before?
45% : Kelsi Corkran, the Supreme Court director at Georgetown's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, is arguing on behalf of expectant mothers and immigrants' rights groups.
45% : A divided Supreme Court gave Trump a big win on May 6, ruling that the administration can enforce the president's ban on transgender people serving in the military while court challenges continue.
43% : Trump wrote.
40% : Trump urges Supreme Court to limit birthright citizenship President Donald Trump alerted his followers on social media on May 15 about the Supreme Court case, saying the constitutional amendment he seeks to limit was never intended to grant citizenship to people temporarily in the country.
40% : Trump wrote that the amendment ratified in 1868 was intended to apply only to "the BABIES OF SLAVES."
38% : The states, immigrants' rights groups and expectant parents who successfully sought national injunctions say they're the only way to prevent a chaotic patchwork of citizenship rules across the country.
31% : "It had nothing to do with Illegal Immigration for people wanting to SCAM our Country, from all parts of the World, which they have done for many years," Trump wrote. - Bart Jansen Who is arguing the case for those challenging Trump's executive order? Jeremy Feigenbaum, New Jersey's solicitor general, is representing the states challenging Trump's executive order.
29% : Judges have ruled the policy will likely be found unconstitutional when it's fully litigated, so Trump can't enforce it in the meantime.
29% : Despite a 150-year tradition of granting citizenship to everyone born in the United States, Trump said it was never intended for the children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visitors.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link