TownhallMaddow Uncorks BlueAnon Theory Linking Trump and UnitedHC Shooter, As Media Deny FBI at the J-6 Riot
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
40% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-46% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-29% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : Maddow learned that the shooter once posted a favorable review of a book by Ted Kaczynski on the Goodreads site, so she was able to invoke Trump because one time Blake Masters had referred to Kaczynski as a "subversive thinker."37% : These are the same people who cry out when Trump is granted an even-handed platform and decry that he has become "normalized.
37% : Also, as POLITICO explains, the dozens of FBI contacts that day were rather active: Among the tens of thousands of Trump supporters who flooded Washington that day, 26 were people who had served as informants for the FBI.
31% : BlueAnon - MSNBC With everyone discussing the UnitedHealthcare CEO murder, Rachel Maddow had to join in, and of course, she had to take it to the logical extreme - tying this to Donald Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
