Financial Times Article RatingNigel Lawson's successors all failed to escape his shadow
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : Hammond's next three replacements -- Sajid Javid, Rishi Sunak and Nadhim Zahawi -- all struggled with the same essential problem: that the political promises made by the Conservatives in 2019 to get Brexit over the line made it impossible to deliver the type of economic policies that Lawson had.52% : Despite [David] Cameron's promise of a referendum, Brexit still felt in many ways like a fringe position.
46% : Sunak famously had a portrait of Lawson on his wall, but in office he raised taxes to historic highs.
44% : He later recanted his pro-European past and became the first major figure in the Conservative party to call for Brexit in 2013.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
