Financial Times Article RatingRWE criticises US ban on imports from China's Xinjiang region
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-16% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
-58% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : RWE's intervention came as the company reported better than expected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation of €6.3bn for last year.49% : Germany's largest power producer, which has expanded aggressively into renewable energy, including in the US, said it had been suffering "considerable project delays" as a result of what it called the time-consuming reviews of solar module deliveries.
46% : The criticism from RWE also underlines the tension between the Biden administration's ambitions to boost renewable energy production and its efforts to upbraid China.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
