The Guardian Article RatingThe Observer view on Sudan's civil war: a humanitarian disaster we choose to ignore
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-57% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : It concluded that a seven-week campaign of killings and abuses early last summer by Sudan's rebel Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and allied Arab militias against the Massalit people and other non-Arab communities around West Darfur's capital, El Geneina, involved multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity, and amounted to ethnic cleansing.48% : The US, UK and the EU have taken only limited action so far.
44% : What happened in El Geneina last year, when the UN says 15,000 people may have died, could happen again imminently.
42% : The city is "on the precipice of a large-scale massacre", the US ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, warned recently.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
