International Business Times UK Article RatingTom Homan Bribery Probe Closure Fuels Ethics Debate in Trump's Immigration Team
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-50% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
9% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Homan, a former New York police officer, rose through the ranks of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and became acting director under Trump from 2017 to 2018.49% : Reuters reported that preparations were made for a 30,000-bed facility at the naval base, with Homan explaining that ICE would oversee the site.
41% : Sources claimed the meeting was recorded on hidden cameras and audio devices, and centred on whether Homan accepted $50,000 (£39,000) in return for influence if Trump regained the presidency.
24% : Case closed under Trump officials sparks fresh debate on oversight, ethics and accountability in high-level government appointments.
23% : The allegations emerged when Homan was out of government but widely expected to return if Trump won re-election.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
