
To those who wish to penalise poor people, cold and hunger are signs of a perfect system | Frances Ryan
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-26% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : The pandemic showed dramatic state intervention could be mobilised in a time of crisis - and it would be hard to argue vast hikes in food and energy prices do not constitute another.51% : That move itself came after a decade of cuts and freezes to social security.
48% : It is accepted that hunger is an aberration for working families, but somehow justified for those who claim social security; that it is quite right for a certain level of suffering to come with being on benefits, but would naturally be wrong happening to "other" people.
44% : Cutting social security in real terms in the middle of a cost of living crisis is, in many ways, the natural end point for this narrative, a darkly cruel turn of events that is only possible in a political culture that long ago lost its hold on decency or even common sense.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.