Trump closes in on Ukraine minerals deal with Zelensky
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
34% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-34% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
46% : Trump had wanted access to minerals as a quid pro quo for U.S. military support but a deal could also underscore Washington's commitment to Ukraine as an economic partner and be used as leverage on Putin to negotiate peace.41% : Trump had sought to frame the agreement as partial repayment for U.S. military aid, claiming Ukraine owed Washington up to $300 billion although U.S. government figures put the amount at $174 billion.
29% : As Trump seeks to lessen dependence on China, the world's biggest supplier of minerals, a deal giving the U.S. access to Ukrainian minerals has been discussed for months and was the subject of a heated debated between Zelensky and Trump at their White House meeting on February 28.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.