The Atlantic Article RatingTrump's Newest Crackdown on Dissent
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-24% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-5% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
30% : If they allow Trump to succeed, he'll have taken a major step toward making dissent illegal.24% : Considering two analogous cases offers more reason to treat the charges against McIver as political intimidation.
23% : Trump picked a U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia who so overstepped his bounds while serving on an interim basis that even Republican senators couldn't stomach confirming him; instead Trump appointed him head of a DOJ "Weaponization Working Group," an unintentionally revealing name.
20% : (McIver denies any assault; her lawyer called the charges "spectacularly inappropriate.") One might grant the charges more benefit of the doubt if not for Donald Trump's open desire to turn the Justice Department into a tool of political retribution, or his previous record of downplaying attacks against law enforcement.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
