
Trump's Newest Crackdown on Dissent
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-24% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-5% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
30% : If they allow Trump to succeed, he'll have taken a major step toward making dissent illegal.24% : Considering two analogous cases offers more reason to treat the charges against McIver as political intimidation.
23% : Trump picked a U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia who so overstepped his bounds while serving on an interim basis that even Republican senators couldn't stomach confirming him; instead Trump appointed him head of a DOJ "Weaponization Working Group," an unintentionally revealing name.
20% : (McIver denies any assault; her lawyer called the charges "spectacularly inappropriate.") One might grant the charges more benefit of the doubt if not for Donald Trump's open desire to turn the Justice Department into a tool of political retribution, or his previous record of downplaying attacks against law enforcement.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.