
US supreme court hears challenge to Obamacare free preventive healthcare
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-38% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
4% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
46% : In a supreme court filing, the plaintiffs argued that the Affordable Care Act has transformed the longstanding taskforce from an advisory body into one that now issues "decrees" to insurers, adding that the HHS secretary has no authority to stop taskforce recommendations from becoming binding law.41% : At issue is constitutionality of taskforce that decides which services insurers must cover without cost to patients The US supreme court was hearing arguments today in a case that could threaten Americans' access to free preventive healthcare services under the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare.
41% : The government's appeal of the fifth circuit's decision initially was filed by Biden's administration before being taken up by Trump.
35% : A big critic of the program during his first term, Trump and his administration have now taken over the case after the Biden administration initially filed the appeal.
29% : In Monday's oral arguments, Jonathan Mitchell, the conservative lawyer representing the plaintiffs who previously represented Trump in ballot access litigation, insisted that taskforce members are "principal officers" because "their preventive care coverage mandates are neither directed nor supervised by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.