Why Does the Met Gala Get a Better Tax Deal Than a Soup Kitchen?
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
16% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
34% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : Congress created the charitable deduction in 1917, just a few years after creating the income tax, because it worried the government was siphoning money from charities.55% : It's been a few years since Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the New York Democrat, showed up at the Met Gala in a white dress with "Tax the Rich" printed on the back.
51% : Americans with bigger incomes get larger income tax deductions on every dollar they donate to charity.
49% : Under a matching system, the government would provide the same subsidy to everyone -- even those who don't make enough to pay income taxes -- which would remove the tax incentive for charities to chase wealthy donors.
47% : The deduction does seem to provide a modest boost to charitable giving, but another way of describing the available evidence is that most donations to charity aren't motivated by tax breaks.
42% : What does stick in my craw is that the Met gets to reap the benefits of larger federal tax breaks than your local church or soup kitchen.
41% : The Met benefits, too, because tax breaks encourage people and corporations to make larger donations.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.