Why Does the Met Gala Get a Better Tax Deal Than a Soup Kitchen?
- Bias Rating
Center
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
16% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
34% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : Congress created the charitable deduction in 1917, just a few years after creating the income tax, because it worried the government was siphoning money from charities.55% : It's been a few years since Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the New York Democrat, showed up at the Met Gala in a white dress with "Tax the Rich" printed on the back.
51% : Americans with bigger incomes get larger income tax deductions on every dollar they donate to charity.
49% : Under a matching system, the government would provide the same subsidy to everyone -- even those who don't make enough to pay income taxes -- which would remove the tax incentive for charities to chase wealthy donors.
47% : The deduction does seem to provide a modest boost to charitable giving, but another way of describing the available evidence is that most donations to charity aren't motivated by tax breaks.
42% : What does stick in my craw is that the Met gets to reap the benefits of larger federal tax breaks than your local church or soup kitchen.
41% : The Met benefits, too, because tax breaks encourage people and corporations to make larger donations.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.