Deseret News Article RatingNew Supreme Court term may lead to more precedent-busting decisions
- Bias Rating
8% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
42% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
82% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : Sackett v. EPA could significantly curtail the agency's authority by determining if wetlands are "waters of the United States" under the purview of the Clean Water Act.44% : Last term, a court ruling in West Virginia v. EPA significantly limited the agency's power to create rules regulating greenhouse-gas emissions.
39% : After the blockbuster Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision that struck down a federal right to abortion last June, this term has the potential for more precedent busting results on other issues.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.