How News Sources Portray Non-renewable Energy Policies
This chart shows how major news sources across the ideological spectrum frame non-renewable energy policies, from left to right-leaning perspectives.
Many of the media biases we observe, whether in news coverage or political rhetoric, stem from fundamental differences in policy perspectives held by major political parties. One of the many key points of conflict is the use of non-renewable energy.
Non-renewable energy refers to “energy derived from sources that will run out or will not replenish”, including coal, oil, and natural gas. These resources have fueled industrial growth for centuries, but they have also raised major concerns regarding sustainability and climate change. As the years go by, the U.S. continues to face increasing pressure to reconsider its dependence on such resources.
The debate of public policy on energy focuses on balancing economic stability with environmental responsibility. Non-renewable energy accounts for roughly 84% of total U.S. primary energy production, but many policymakers argue that this heavy reliance poses long-term sustainability risks. This policy issue has fueled a central divide between Democrats and Republicans, generally pushing for either a shift in focus to renewable technology or the continuing protection of fossil fuel industries. These competing priorities continue to shape modern debates on U.S. policy regarding climate goals, energy dependence, and environmental protection.
The Democratic Stance on Non-renewable Energy
The Democratic Party platform largely supports transitioning the United States toward renewable energy resources while slowly letting go of non-renewable resources over time. The Democratic stance on renewable energy emphasizes investment in clean technologies, such as solar, wind, and hydropower, alongside stricter emissions regulations for the oil and gas industries. They argue that continuously relying on non-renewable energy undermines environmental sustainability and public health, offering a darker perspective on major concerns.
Democratic policies usually focus on incentivizing green innovation, carbon taxes, and commitments to global climate accords like the Paris Agreement. Under Democratic control, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 dedicated hundreds of billions of dollars to expand clean energy infrastructure and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This reflected a larger belief that economic growth can coincide with environmental protection if properly regulated, being more beneficial for the near future. The Democratic Party generally views policies on renewable energy as a tool for the nation’s prosperity in combating climate change.
Politicians Who Oppose Non-renewable Energy Rights
The Democratic Party platform largely supports transitioning the United States toward renewable energy resources while slowly letting go of non-renewable resources over time.
The Republican Stance on Non-renewable Energy
The Republican Party’s policy stance on non-renewable energy favors maintaining and expanding the nation’s fossil fuel production to promote energy independence and economic stability. They promote domestic policy on energy that prioritizes deregulation, a key Republican ideology, as well as job creation and lower consumer costs. The Party argues that for this to work, the nation needs to continue using coal, oil, and natural gas for the greater good.
Republicans argue that renewable technologies are not at the stage to replace non-renewable sources yet, meaning they aren’t ready to fulfill these roles without overbearing costs. In addition, they stress that overregulation harms American workers and industries. The GOP supports oil drilling and natural gas exports, viewing these as vital to national security and international competitiveness.
The Republican Party tends to view energy policy laws that limit drilling or impose carbon taxes as threats to free-market efficiency and economic freedom. Unlike the Democrats, the Republicans advocate an approach that uses both renewable energy and fossil fuels to ensure reliability and affordability.
Politicians Who Support Non-renewable Energy Rights
The Republican Party favors maintaining and expanding the nation’s fossil fuel production to promote energy independence and economic stability.
Policy on Non-renewable Energy in the United States
In the 21st century, energy policy continues to divide Democrats and Republicans through their different ideologies. Democrats support transitioning to renewable sources, advocating for clean energy subsidies and stricter environmental regulations. Their tailored U.S. policies are focused on helping reduce carbon emissions and addressing climate change. Democratic U.S. policy on renewable energy often emphasizes government intervention, investment in green technology, and long-term sustainability.
On the other hand, Republicans prioritize energy independence and economic growth, arguing that limiting the use of fossil fuels harms Americans the most. Policymakers usually favor deregulation policies that expand drilling, arguing that traditional energy industries are essential to maintaining national security and stable energy prices.
When it comes to these national divides, policy is reflected through the states. Democratic states promote renewable energy goals, while Republican states continue to protect fossil fuel production. Both parties agree that the U.S. needs a reliable energy supply, but the difference is rooted in the type of energy used and its long-term effect on the nation.
A Brief History of Non-renewable Energy in the U.S.
Renewable energy policy in the United States has been a key cornerstone of the economy since the 19th century. In Titusville, Pennsylvania, the first commercial oil well in the U.S. was drilled, marking a crucial beginning for new energy efforts. This quickly led to oil being used for industrialization, transportation, and electricity. By the 20th century, major oil fields in Texas, Oklahoma, and California were discovered, fueling rapid economic growth and making the U.S. a leading global energy producer.
As time went by, government legislation reflected growing awareness of the impacts of fossil fuel dependence on the economy and environment. The Energy Policy Act of 1992 encouraged efficiency and developed alternatives to fuel. Later on, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 expanded domestic energy production and infrastructure. The Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015 modernized the U.S. energy grid to support cleaner technologies. These acts show how policies regarding renewable energy have evolved in response to the continuing changes in industrial needs and environmental practices.
What the Future Holds
The future of non-renewable energy depends on the balance between environmental priorities and economic growth. As technological advancements increase, there is also an increase in policy debates between Democrats and Republicans. Democrats are expected to continue promoting green initiatives while Republicans emphasize affordable energy and energy independence. The challenge lies in creating balanced policies that won’t harm the environment and ensure long-term economic prosperity.
To explore how each political party views other key policy topics, visit Biasly’s full list of Political Party Policy Stances.
To unlock more data-driven insights into media bias, explore political leanings with research-backed tools, and customize your news feed around what matters most to you, sign up for a Biasly Premium News Membership.
