Previous Troubling Reports

This article is concerning to me due to the clear bias present. Apart from not using sources that highlight different viewpoints, the author is straightforwardly name-calling the opposition. At one point in the text, the author refers to the contenders as "clowns." Not only is this entirely unprofessional, it also creates a polarizing narrative and further accentuates polarization in American society.

The conservative bias is very apparent from the title alone. The author falsely characterizes President Joe Biden's student loan debt relief as buying votes for the upcoming election. It would suggest that Biden relief their student loans in exchange for their votes despite no evidence. The type of headline is designed to generate outrage for Hannity's conservative audience.

I think the title is making it seem as if Harvard and a lot of other colleges never required test scores to begin with. I think that articles covering the topic of colleges returning to their pre covid admissions requirements are looking for a negative response for those who thought that not submitting test scores made admissions easier. In reality, although test scores were not required, test scores have been important throughout covid and until recently, and make an application stronger when test scores have been submitted.

I think the title is making it seem as if Harvard and a lot of other colleges never required test scores to begin with. I think that articles covering the topic of colleges returning to their pre covid admissions requirements are looking for a negative response for those who thought that not submitting test scores made admissions easier. In reality, although test scores were not required, test scores have been important throughout covid and until recently, and make an application stronger when test scores have been submitted.

The headline is misleading and ambiguous as to why Trump is being charged. As a reader, the headline seems disconnected and confusing from the content of the article, left unaware of what he is actually being charged for.

The headline is misleading and ambiguous as to why Trump is being charged. As a reader, the headline seems disconnected and confusing from the content of the article, left unaware of what he is actually being charged for.

The headline is misleading and ambiguous as to why Trump is being charged. As a reader, the headline seems disconnected and confusing from the content of the article, left unaware of what he is actually being charged for.

The headline is misleading and ambiguous as to why Trump is being charged. As a reader, the headline seems disconnected and confusing from the content of the article, left unaware of what he is actually being charged for.

The headline is misleading and ambiguous as to why Trump is being charged. As a reader, the headline seems disconnected and confusing from the content of the article, left unaware of what he is actually being charged for.

The headline is misleading and ambiguous as to why Trump is being charged. As a reader, the headline seems disconnected and confusing from the content of the article, left unaware of what he is actually being charged for.

The headline is misleading and ambiguous as to why Trump is being charged. As a reader, the headline seems disconnected and confusing from the content of the article, left unaware of what he is actually being charged for.

I think this article is biased due to the lack of sources with different viewpoints. By saying "undecided voters," the author makes a generalization without showing the perspectives of people who do not share that opinion. It works to favor a conservative agenda that "even biden supporters think Trump is innocent," by picking and choosing subjects that agree with their points and not mentioning those that disagree at all.