
What does the new US Supreme Court ruling mean for carbon emissions? | New Scientist
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
52% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-59% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
47% : A number of coal companies and coal-producing states, led by West Virginia, petitioned the Supreme Court to reconsider the circuit court's decision.46% : The decision comes on the heels of several explosive decisions from the court, including the decisions to expand gun rights and to overturn Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling that protected the right to abortion.
43% : The dissenting justices, citing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's dire assessments of the impacts of climate change, wrote the ruling "deprives EPA of the power needed - and the power granted - to curb the emission of greenhouse gases."
42% : The decision in West Virginia v Environmental Protection Agency says the EPA does not have the authority to control greenhouse gas emissions from power production by requiring changes to power production across entire electrical grids.
37% : On 30 June, the US Supreme Court issued a ruling that could set back efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as well as limit the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate other environmental issues.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.