X Corp Sues To Block California Content Moderation Law

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% : " The company adds that the law impose "tremendously burdensome requirements on social media companies, requiring them to keep records about potentially hundreds of millions of content moderation decisions made on a daily basis.
49% : The California law "has both the purpose and likely effect of pressuring companies such as X Corp. to remove, demonetize, or deprioritize constitutionally-protected speech that the state deems undesirable or harmful, and places an unjustified and undue burden on social media companies such as X Corp.," lawyers for the company, including First Amendment expert Floyd Abrams, allege in a complaint brought Friday in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. X Corp. alleges that even though the state touts the law as a mere "transparency" measure, lawmakers' intention was to pressure platforms to suppress speech that's protected by the First Amendment.
38% : " X Corp. says the law is unconstitutional, arguing that the statute interferes with private companies' editorial judgments about how to handle speech that's protected by the First Amendment.
34% : " X Corp. is seeking a declaration that the law is unconstitutional, and an injunction prohibiting enforcement.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.