Financial Times Article RatingDonald Trump's inaugural committee raised record-breaking $240mn
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
10% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
18% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
13% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : Donald Trump raised more than $239mn for his second inauguration, federal filings showed, a record-breaking sum as some of the most powerful US chief executives sought to curry favour with the incoming president.54% : The fundraising haul -- more than twice the $107mn Trump raised in 2017 -- spanned major American industries.
41% : Trump also raised millions from America's wealthy elite, including $1mn from conservative megadonors Miriam Adelson, widow of the late casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, and Marlene Ricketts, wife of TD Ameritrade founder Joe Ricketts.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
