New US border policy poses risk to fundamental rights, warns UN's Türk
- Bias Rating
-40% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"Those most in need of asylum, and those in vulnerable situations are unlikely to meet the restrictive requirements to be granted humanitarian parole, including having a financial sponsor in the US, he noted." | Positive | 2% Conservative |
"He explained that Title 42 has already been used by US immigration officials 2.5 million times at the southern border, to expel people to Mexico or their home country, without assessing what risks they faced as a result of being returned." | Negative | -2% Liberal |
"But he insisted that the measure should not come at the expense of fundamental human rights, including the right to seek asylum and the right to an individual assessment of protection needs." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% :Those most in need of asylum, and those in vulnerable situations are unlikely to meet the restrictive requirements to be granted humanitarian parole, including having a financial sponsor in the US, he noted.49% : He explained that Title 42 has already been used by US immigration officials 2.5 million times at the southern border, to expel people to Mexico or their home country, without assessing what risks they faced as a result of being returned.
48% : But he insisted that the measure "should not come at the expense of fundamental human rights, including the right to seek asylum and the right to an individual assessment of protection needs".
45% : Mr. Türk stressed that seeking asylum "is a human right, no matter a person's origin, immigration status, nor how they arrived at an international border.""These measures appear to be at variance with the prohibition of collective expulsion and the principle of non-refoulement," the OHCHR chief said.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.