Analysis | Trump underperformed GOP House candidates more in places he won
- Bias Rating
-16% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
2% Positive
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"In 2020, Trump got north of 74 million votes nationally." | Positive | 6% Conservative |
"In nearly all of the districts where House candidates overperformed relative to Trump, they also did better in the vote margin." | Positive | 4% Conservative |
"In nearly a third of the districts where Trump got more votes, though, the Republican ruing for the House actually had a better margin than the president -- meaning that they won by more or lost by less." | Positive | 2% Conservative |
"But when we compare those numbers at a district level, we see that, in most House districts, Republican candidates (wiing and losing) got more votes than Trump, 227 to 208." | Negative | -2% Liberal |
"Because Joe Biden got more votes than Democratic House candidates in 337 districts." | Negative | -6% Liberal |
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
% :*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.