Bizpac Review Article RatingAppeals court pushes back on Trump's presidential immunity claim
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
98% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-10% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "I think it is paradoxical to say that his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed allows him to violate criminal laws, Henderson said." | Positive | 34% Conservative |
| "Pan noted there is also an executive interest in enforcing criminal laws." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
| "Once the panel issues a ruling, the issue could be back before the justices if Trump chooses to appeal." | Negative | -38% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
67% : ""I think it is paradoxical to say that his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed allows him to violate criminal laws," Henderson said.54% : "Pan noted there is also an executive interest in "enforcing criminal laws.
31% : Once the panel issues a ruling, the issue could be back before the justices if Trump chooses to appeal.
24% : She pressed Sauer to answer whether Trump could have been "properly prosecuted" if he had been impeached on the same or related conduct as is contained in the indictment.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.