The American Conservative Article RatingAssert Civilian Control of the Bureaucracy - The American Conservative
- Bias Rating
98% Extremely Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "Trump might have lost the election -- in other words, he would be where he is now -- but he would have won a more important victory over what he termed the deep state." | Negative | -2% Liberal |
| "As they decide whether to select Trump as the party's standard-bearer again in 2024, Republican primary voters will have to take this into account." | Negative | -2% Liberal |
| "Donald Trump was the duly elected president, and Anthony Fauci was not." | Negative | -20% Liberal |
| "Of the many decisions that Donald Trump made during his presidency, his greatest mistake may have been refusing to fire Anthony Fauci." | Negative | -26% Liberal |
| "Trump had good political reasons for not firing Fauci, as doing so would have given the doctor freedom to attack Trump even more openly during a hotly contested election cycle." | Negative | -50% Liberal |
| "Trump had good political reasons for not firing Fauci, as doing so would have given the doctor freedom to attack Trump even more openly during a hotly contested election cycle." | Negative | -50% Liberal |
| "If Fauci wished to exercise his First Amendment right to publicly criticize the president, then he ought to have quit -- as James Mattis did when his differences with Trump proved irreconcilable." | Negative | -58% Liberal |
| "If Fauci wished to exercise his First Amendment right to publicly criticize the president, then he ought to have quit -- as James Mattis did when his differences with Trump proved irreconcilable." | Negative | -58% Liberal |
| "But in the last year of Donald Trump's presidency, Fauci became to Trump what MacArthur was to Truman: a public critic of the president's policy approach, and a cult figure to those who opposed it." | Negative | -66% Liberal |
| "But in the last year of Donald Trump's presidency, Fauci became to Trump what MacArthur was to Truman: a public critic of the president's policy approach, and a cult figure to those who opposed it." | Negative | -66% Liberal |
| "For all his rhetoric about strength and toughness, Trump did not have the gumption of Truman, or even of President Obama, who rightly fired General Stanley McChrystal in 2010 after the latter disparaged him publicly." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
| "For all his rhetoric about strength and toughness, Trump did not have the gumption of Truman, or even of President Obama, who rightly fired General Stanley McChrystal in 2010 after the latter disparaged him publicly." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
% :*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.