
Critics, Opposition Leaders Bemoan Johnston's Decision Against Calling Public Inquiry on Election Interference
View Original Article98% Extremely Conservative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
98% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Bias Score Analysis:
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Policy Leaning Analysis:
Politician Portrayal Analysis:
This article includes the following Politician Portrayal sentiments, providing an average sentiment of 98% Negative and bias score of 98% Conservative:
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 40% Conservative
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 38% Conservative
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 24% Conservative
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 24% Conservative
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 24% Conservative
This sentence includes Positive entity towards "David Johnston", providing a -24% Liberal
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 22% Conservative
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 18% Conservative
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 16% Conservative
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 14% Conservative
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 8% Conservative
This sentence includes Negative entity towards "David Johnston", providing a 8% Conservative
This sentence includes Positive entity towards "David Johnston", providing a -2% Liberal
"Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre, Bloc Quebecois leader Yves-Franu00e7ois Blanchet, and NDP leader Jagmeet Singh all stated their disappointment with Johnston's decision shortly after he aounced it around midday on May 23."
This is a negative sentiment.
"All federal opposition leaders and various national officials are criticizing Special Rapporteur David Johnston's decision not to call for a public inquiry into foreign interference in Canada's last two general elections."
This is a negative sentiment.
""NDP Leader Singh also reacted to the aouncement on Twitter, saying he was "deeply disappointed" in Johnston's decision."
This is a negative sentiment.
"In the report, Johnston said a public inquiry can't be held since the classified information informing the matter caot be publicly revealed."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Poilievre told reporters in Quebec City that calling a public inquiry would've been "common sense" and accused the prime minister of only appointing Johnston as special rapporteur in order to "help Trudeau cover up the influence by Beijing in our democracy.""
This is a negative sentiment.
"nn"While preparing his report, Mr. Johnston was given complete access to all and any relevant records and documents from across government," Trudeau said."
This is a positive sentiment.
"Various officials also expressed disappointment with Johnston's decision, including Mehmet Tohti, executive director of the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Later the same day, Trudeau defended both his appointment of Johnston as special rapporteur and the former governor general's decision not to call on the Liberal government for a public inquiry on election interference."
This is a negative sentiment.
""Johnston's rejection of public inquiry is stuing and absolutely, shockingly disappointing," Tohti wrote on Twitter."
This is a negative sentiment.
"In a Twitter post shortly after the aouncement, Bloc Leader Blanchet wrote in French that Johnston's decision shows that his "mandate was and remains to protect secrecy, the Liberal Party and [Justin Trudeau]."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Johnston, who was appointed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in March to investigate reports of foreign interference in Canada's 2019 and 2021 general elections, filed his first report on the matter on May 23."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Trudeau told reporters in Ottawa that Johnston's decision was informed by "thousands of pages of classified and unclassified documents" on matters of foreign interference."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Johnston was previously a member of the foundation, which is named after the prime minister's father."
This is a positive sentiment.
Politicians:
David JohnstonSentiments
2% Johnston was previously a member of the foundation, which is named after the prime minister's father."
-8% Johnston, who was appointed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in March to investigate reports of foreign interference in Canada's 2019 and 2021 general elections, ..."
-8% Trudeau told reporters in Ottawa that Johnston's decision was informed by "thousands of pages of classified and unclassified documents" on matters of foreign interference."
-14% In a Twitter post shortly after the announcement, Bloc Leader Blanchet wrote in French that Johnston's decision shows that his "mandate was and remains ..."
-16% "Johnston's rejection of public inquiry is stunning and absolutely, shockingly disappointing," Tohti wrote on Twitter."
-18% Later the same day, Trudeau defended both his appointment of Johnston as special rapporteur and the former governor general's decision not to call on ..."
-22% Various officials also expressed disappointment with Johnston's decision, including Mehmet Tohti, executive director of the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project.nn"
-24% Poilievre told reporters in Quebec City that calling a public inquiry would've been "common sense" and accused the prime minister of only appointing Johnston ..."
-100% """
We have listed the top 10 sentiments. More sentiments do exist. Please review the full article for more information.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
% :*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.