Designer who won't make same-sex wedding websites loses case
- Bias Rating
-66% Very Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
66% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"Founded in 1994 by Christian leaders concerned about religious freedom, the group said it would appeal Monday's ruling." | Positive | 2% Conservative |
"And Drink Lifestyle United States Supreme Court Decisions Weddings Occasions Freedom Of Religion Religion And Politics Same Sex Marriage" | Negative | -4% Liberal |
"In his dissent, Tymkovich wrote that this case illustrates exactly why we have a First Amendment." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Founded in 1994 by Christian leaders concerned about religious freedom, the group said it would appeal Monday's ruling.48% : And Drink Lifestyle United States Supreme Court Decisions Weddings Occasions Freedom Of Religion Religion And Politics Same Sex Marriage
45% : In his dissent, Tymkovich wrote that "this case illustrates exactly why we have a First Amendment.
44% : The anti-discrimination law is the same one at issue in the case of Colorado baker Jack Phillips that was decided in 2018 by the U.S. Supreme Court.
41% : In 2019, a divided three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found in favor of two Christian filmmakers who said they should not have to make videos celebrating same-sex marriage under Minnesota's anti-discrimination law because the videos are a form of speech protected by the First Amendment.
33% : A U.S. appeals court has ruled against a web designer who didn't want to create wedding websites for same-sex couples and sued to challenge Colorado's anti-discrimination law, another twist in a series of court rulings nationwide about whether businesses denying services to LGBTQ people amounts to bias or freedom of speech.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.