Doctors can sue FDA to block abortion pill because it's 'emotionally taxing' to treat women who have taken it: Fifth Circuit
- Bias Rating
-24% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-30% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
46% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"The court reasoned that the plaintiffs, a group of anti-abortion doctors, therefore had standing to sue to pull mifepristone from the market, a ruling that might well open the floodgates for similar litigation involving other drugs." | Positive | 22% Conservative |
"But the panel kept in place Kacsmaryk's decision to roll back the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) 2016 decision to make the drug more easily available, including by mail, finding that anti-abortion doctors who had treated patients suffering from side effects had been sufficiently injured to justify their lawsuit." | Positive | 18% Conservative |
"An appeal to the current Supreme Court -- one that is not only exceedingly hostile to abortion, but that is also committed to curtailing the authority of federal administrative agencies -- is unlikely to yield positive results for the Biden administration." | Negative | -16% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : The court reasoned that the plaintiffs, a group of anti-abortion doctors, therefore had standing to sue to pull mifepristone from the market, a ruling that might well open the floodgates for similar litigation involving other drugs.59% : But the panel kept in place Kacsmaryk's decision to roll back the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) 2016 decision to make the drug more easily available, including by mail, finding that anti-abortion doctors who had treated patients suffering from side effects had been sufficiently injured to justify their lawsuit.
42% : An appeal to the current Supreme Court -- one that is not only exceedingly hostile to abortion, but that is also committed to curtailing the authority of federal administrative agencies -- is unlikely to yield positive results for the Biden administration.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.