Editorial: Sure, reduce pot taxes. But California needs bigger fixes to its broken marijuana market
View Original Article-64% Very Liberal
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
70% Very Conservative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
42% Negative
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Reliability Score Analysis
The Reliability Score of the article is determined on a percentage score basis from 0 to 100%.
- Opposite Sources as Poor for the lower number of sources with different viewpoints.
- Unique Sources as Poor for the lower number of different sources.
- Multiple Sources as Poor for the lower number of total sources.
- Multiple Quotes as Poor for the lower number of quotes used in the article.
- Quote Length as Poor for the lower number of words used in each quote.
Opposite Sources: 0% Poor (Grade F) Unique Sources: 0% Poor (Grade F) Multiple Sources: 0% Poor (Grade F) Multiple Quotes: 0% Poor (Grade F) Quote Length: 0% Poor (Grade F)
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Policy Leaning Analysis
This article includes the following sentiments, providing an average bias score of 70% Conservative:
- 2 negative sentiments for Criminal justice
- 4 negative sentiments for Marijuana Legalization
- 2 negative sentiments for Taxes
"That doesn't mean people aren't selling or buying marijuana in those communities -- they're just doing it illegally, using unlicensed shops or dealers."
"Legalization came with political compromise on taxes and rules that have stymied efforts to move illegal pot operators into the legal marketplace."
"During those three years, the state would spend up to $150 million annually to support programs that rely on marijuana tax revenue, including youth education and substance abuse prevention, environmental cleanup of illegal cannabis farms and law enforcement."
"Industry groups argue Newsom's proposal won't reduce taxes enough to help legal operators compete with the tax-free illicit market, and they're lobbying to cut the excise tax from 15% to 5%."
"To help level the playing field for licensed businesses, the state also needs to ramp up enforcement against illegal operators through strategies such as tax enforcement, administrative penalties and power shutoffs."
"Newsom wants to eliminate the cultivation tax, a flat per-pound fee paid by cannabis farmers, that has gone up each year even as wholesale prices of marijuana have gone down, squeezing profits."
"It's also a smart, small step toward fixing the state's marijuana mess that was created, in part, by Proposition 64 -- the 2016 ballot measure that legalized the adult use and sale of marijuana."
Politician Portrayal Analysis:
This article includes the following Politician Portrayal sentiments, providing an average sentiment of 42% Negative and bias score of 42% Conservative:
"Newsom's proposal is not a done deal."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Industry groups argue Newsom's proposal won't reduce taxes enough to help legal operators compete with the tax-free illicit market, and they're lobbying to cut the excise tax from 15% to 5%."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Newsom wants to create a $20.5-million grant program to help cities develop licensing programs and start to permit pot shops."
This is a positive sentiment.
"Newsom's proposal would raise the 15% excise tax on marijuana sales to 19% in 2025, which officials estimate will bring in enough revenue to make up for the loss of the cultivation tax."
This is a negative sentiment.
"To help the floundering legal market, Gov. Gavin Newsom has proposed tax relief in his May budget revision designed to reduce pot prices for three years and help struggling farmers and dispensary owners."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Newsom wants to eliminate the cultivation tax, a flat per-pound fee paid by caabis farmers, that has gone up each year even as wholesale prices of marijuana have gone down, squeezing profits."
This is a negative sentiment.
Policies:
Criminal justiceTaxes
Marijuana Legalization
Politicians:
Gavin NewsomSentiments
- Liberal
- Conservative
-4% To help the floundering legal market, Gov. Gavin Newsom has proposed tax relief in his May budget revision designed to reduce pot prices for ..."
-6% "It's also a smart, small step toward fixing the state's marijuana mess that was created, in part, by Proposition 64 -- the 2016 ballot ..."
-16% "Newsom wants to eliminate the cultivation tax, a flat per-pound fee paid by cannabis farmers, that has gone up each year even as wholesale ..."
-16% "To help level the playing field for licensed businesses, the state also needs to ramp up enforcement against illegal operators through strategies such as ..."
-24% "During those three years, the state would spend up to $150 million annually to support programs that rely on marijuana tax revenue, including youth ..."
-28% "More than five years after Californians voted to legalize marijuana, the vast majority of pot sold in the state still comes from illegal sellers.""
-28% "Legalization came with political compromise on taxes and rules that have stymied efforts to move illegal pot operators into the legal marketplace.""
-30% "That doesn't mean people aren't selling or buying marijuana in those communities -- they're just doing it illegally, using unlicensed shops or dealers.""
-40% "Industry groups argue Newsom's proposal won't reduce taxes enough to help legal operators compete with the tax-free illicit market, and they're lobbying to cut ..."
We have listed the top 10 sentiments. More sentiments do exist. Please review the full article for more information.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
47% : It's also a smart, small step toward fixing the state's marijuana mess that was created, in part, by Proposition 64 -- the 2016 ballot measure that legalized the adult use and sale of marijuana.42% :Newsom wants to eliminate the cultivation tax, a flat per-pound fee paid by cannabis farmers, that has gone up each year even as wholesale prices of marijuana have gone down, squeezing profits.
42% : To help level the playing field for licensed businesses, the state also needs to ramp up enforcement against illegal operators through strategies such as tax enforcement, administrative penalties and power shutoffs.
38% : During those three years, the state would spend up to $150 million annually to support programs that rely on marijuana tax revenue, including youth education and substance abuse prevention, environmental cleanup of illegal cannabis farms and law enforcement.
36% : More than five years after Californians voted to legalize marijuana, the vast majority of pot sold in the state still comes from illegal sellers.
36% : Legalization came with political compromise on taxes and rules that have stymied efforts to move illegal pot operators into the legal marketplace.
35% : That doesn't mean people aren't selling or buying marijuana in those communities -- they're just doing it illegally, using unlicensed shops or dealers.
30% : Industry groups argue Newsom's proposal won't reduce taxes enough to help legal operators compete with the tax-free illicit market, and they're lobbying to cut the excise tax from 15% to 5%.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.