Deseret News Article RatingEPA reveals new wetland protection rule after Supreme Court limits federal power
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
48% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency:" | Positive | 12% Conservative |
| "Following the U.S. Supreme Court's May decision, the Environmental Protection Agency revised wetland guidelines which could remove federal protection from 63" | Positive | 4% Conservative |
| "While I am disappointed in the Supreme Court's decision in the Sackett case, EPA and Army (Corps of Engineers) have an obligation to apply this decision alongside our state co-regulators, Regan said in a statement via AP." | Negative | -24% Liberal |
| "EPA Administrator Michael Regan stated on Tuesday that the agency had no choice after the high court sharply limited the federal government's ability to regulate wetlands that do not have a 'continuous surface coection' to larger, regulated bodies of water, The Associated Press reported." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
| "The landmark decision was made during a case where an Idaho couple, Michael and Chantell Sackett, sought to develop property near Priest Lake in the Idaho panhandle but were stopped by the EPA." | Negative | -22% Liberal |
| "While I am disappointed in the Supreme Court's decision in the Sackett case, EPA and Army (Corps of Engineers) have an obligation to apply this decision alongside our state co-regulators, Regan said in a statement via AP." | Negative | -12% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency:52% : Following the U.S. Supreme Court's May decision, the Environmental Protection Agency revised wetland guidelines which could remove federal protection from 63% of the country's wetlands, according to The Washington Post.
38% : "While I am disappointed in the Supreme Court's decision in the Sackett case, EPA and Army (Corps of Engineers) have an obligation to apply this decision alongside our state co-regulators," Regan said in a statement via AP.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.