Federal judge blocks Biden rule that limits asylum for migrants at the border

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

58% : The Biden administration had argued its rule was needed in anticipation of numerous migrants at the Southern border following the end of Title 42.
48% : The post Federal judge blocks Biden rule that limits asylum for migrants at the border appeared first on Nebraska Examiner.
47% : "The court's ruling is welcome and expected, since the new policy simply rehashed prior rules that restricted access to asylum based on similar grounds, which courts already rejected.
46% : Since the policy was put in place in May, encounters at the Southern border have dropped significantly.
45% : Migrants wait throughout the night of May 10, 2023, in a dust storm at Gate 42, on land between the Rio Grande and the border wall, hoping they will be processed by immigration authorities before the expiration of Title 42.
43% :Two months ago, the Biden administration implemented a temporary two-year rule as an immigration enforcement tool in preparation for the end of Title 42, a pandemic-era tool used to bar more than 2 million migrants from claiming asylum and instead expel them without an asylum hearing.
43% : U.S. laws protect the rights of people fleeing persecution to come to this country and pursue asylum, full stop," Keren Zwick, director of litigation at the National Immigrant Justice Center, said in a statement.
41% : A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Biden administration's rule that restricts migrants from seeking asylum if they arrive at the U.S.-Mexico border without first seeking protection in another country or applying for an asylum appointment online.
34% : Judge Jon S. Tigar, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, wrote in his decision that the rule violates federal law that allows for anyone on U.S. soil to claim asylum.
32% : Tigar argued that the Trump administration's policy ignored Congress' decision to allow immigrants to apply for asylum.
27% : Tigar wrote that the Biden administration's rule "is contrary to law because it presumes ineligible for asylum noncitizens who enter between ports of entry, using a manner of entry that Congress expressly intended should not affect access to asylum.""The Rule is also contrary to law because it presumes ineligible for asylum noncitizens who fail to apply for protection in a transit country, despite Congress's clear intent that such a factor should only limit access to asylum where the transit country actually presents a safe option," he wrote.
27% : If a migrant did not claim asylum in another country or try to make an appointment through the CBP One mobile app, they would be removed and subjected to a five-year ban from requesting asylum and would be ineligible to apply for other parole programs available to nationals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.