Financial Times Article Rating- Bias Rating
28% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
28% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "That year, then-president Bill Clinton tapped him to be US ambassador to the UN -- a position he held for 18 months until he shifted to a different cabinet role as energy secretary." | Positive | 16% Conservative |
| "Once he was out of office, Richardson ran successfully for New Mexico governor, a role he held for eight years, from 2003 to 2011." | Positive | 16% Conservative |
| "Richardson's primary contribution to US diplomacy rested in his ability and willingness to hold negotiations with some of the country's greatest geopolitical rivals and fiercest opponents -- earning him the nickname under-secretary of thugs." | Positive | 12% Conservative |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
% :*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.