Gay Twitter™ swings back hard against SCOTUS's latest attempt to strip away our rights

  • Bias Rating

    10% Center

  • Reliability

    60% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    4% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
"When same-sex marriage was declared legal in all 50 states, it was viewed as a watershed moment in the fight for LGBTQ+ equality."
Positive
4% Conservative
"When the court struck down Roe last summer, it opened the legal door to strike down marriage equality."
Negative
-4% Liberal
"The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands, he wrote."
Negative
-6% Liberal
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : When same-sex marriage was declared legal in all 50 states, it was viewed as a watershed moment in the fight for LGBTQ+ equality.
48% : When the court struck down Roe last summer, it opened the legal door to strike down marriage equality.
47% : "The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands," he wrote.
47% : These rulings suggest the rights of LGBTQ+ people, including to same-sex marriage, are now on more tenuous legal footing than before.
46% : When the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, it set out to rule on whether applying a "public-accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment."
44% : In a 6 to 3 vote among ideological lines, the uber-conservative court sided with a Colorado web designer who says her Christian faith requires her to turn away same-sex couples looking for wedding-related services to celebrate their marriage.
44% : Though Colorado state law prohibits discrimination against LGBTQ+ people, the designer, Lorie Smith, says the non-discrimination statute violates her right to free speech.
38% : The Supreme Court took a wrecking ball to anti-discrimination protections based on a hypothetical scenario.
30% : Earlier in the morning, the six right-wing justices also struck down President Biden's plan to wipe away $400 billion in student loan debt.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link