New York Post Article RatingGov. Burgum's exit from the 2024 race is also rural America's exit...
- Bias Rating
46% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
30% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
38% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
64% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "His plan to make his state carbon neutral by 2030 was concerning, even if he claimed it would be done without government mandates or eliminating fossil fuels." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
| "More land-use regulations, burdensome Environmental Protection Agency requirements, rising fertilizer costs -- everything required for food production is moving in the wrong direction under the Biden administration." | Negative | -54% Liberal |
| "Burgum is more than just an energy governor; he is a CEO and a successful one at that." | Positive | 28% Conservative |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
41% : His plan to make his state carbon neutral by 2030 was concerning, even if he claimed it would be done without government mandates or eliminating fossil fuels.23% : More land-use regulations, burdensome Environmental Protection Agency requirements, rising fertilizer costs -- everything required for food production is moving in the wrong direction under the Biden administration.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.