Bias Meter▼
News▼
Pricing & Services▼
Discussions▼
Tools▼
About▼

How Alvin Bragg made (preposterous) history with Donald Trump's case

View Original Article
Source New York Post bias rating
Published Apr 20, 2024
Source Analysis Score
Help
The Source Analysis Score focuses on assessing the quality of sources and quotes used including their number, lengths, uniqueness, and diversity.
25% ReliablePoor
Bias Rating
Help
The Bias Rating is computed based on a number of factors including bias loaded words, sentiments towards certain political policies, author bias towards politicians, and the amount of tone found in the article.

44% Moderately Conservative

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Policy Leaning
Help
The policy leaning score is derived from author biases for or against a certain political policy, as found in articles.

78% Extremely Conservative

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Politician Portrayal
Help
The politician leaning score is determined by the author's tone and leaning towards the specific politician mentioned in the article.

86% Negative

Overall Sentiment

-22% Negative

Opposite Viewpoint
Category
Topic

Reliability Score Analysis

The Reliability Score of the article is determined on a percentage score basis from 0 to 100%.

  • Opposite Sources as Poor for the lower number of sources with different viewpoints.
  • Unique Sources as Poor for the lower number of different sources.
  • Multiple Sources as Good for a higher number of total sources.
  • Multiple Quotes as Poor for the lower number of quotes used in the article.
  • Quote Length as Poor for the lower number of words used in each quote.

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Policy Leaning Analysis

This article includes the following sentiments, providing an average bias score of 78% Conservative:

  • 1 positive sentiment and 5 negative sentiments for Trump Impeachment.

Politician Portrayal Analysis:

This article includes the following Politician Portrayal sentiments, providing an average sentiment of 86% Negative and bias score of -10% Liberal:

6 negative sentiments and 2 positive sentiments for Donald Trump

Policies:

Trump Impeachment

Politicians:

Donald Trump

Sentiments

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
12% Alvin Bragg is to be commended for getting to trial on the Trump hush-payments case.nn"
2% In his statement of facts, Bragg says Trump orchestrated a scheme to influence the 2016 election "from August 2015 to December 2017."
2% "In his statement of facts, Bragg says Trump orchestrated a scheme to influence the 2016 election from August 2015 to December 2017.""
-14% The trial is all about Trump, but the most important piece of the puzzle is Bragg, since no one else with an ounce of ..."
-16% Never mind that the hush payment does not constitute any of the things that are traditionally defined as campaign expenses -- advertising and the ..."
-26% "The trial is all about Trump, but the most important piece of the puzzle is Bragg, since no one else with an ounce of ..."
-32% "Never mind that the hush payment does not constitute any of the things that are traditionally defined as campaign expenses -- advertising and the ..."
-46% "The underlying offense occurred later, when Trump reimbursed Cohen in 2017 and misleadingly booked the payment not as the reimbursement of a debt but ..."
-48% "As we know, it involves a $130,000 payment from former Trump fixer Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels right before the 2016 election to keep ..."
-50% "It's likely that none of this is going to matter because the New York legal system is so stacked against Trump.""

We have listed the top 10 sentiments. More sentiments do exist. Please review the full article for more information.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

51% : In his statement of facts, Bragg says Trump orchestrated a scheme to influence the 2016 election "from August 2015 to December 2017.
37% : The trial is all about Trump, but the most important piece of the puzzle is Bragg, since no one else with an ounce of judgment would have brought this case.
34% : Never mind that the hush payment does not constitute any of the things that are traditionally defined as campaign expenses -- advertising and the like.Never mind that if Trump had paid Stormy Daniels from his campaign coffers, his enemies would be contending that he had misallocated campaign funds for personal purposes.
27% : The underlying offense occurred later, when Trump reimbursed Cohen in 2017 and misleadingly booked the payment not as the reimbursement of a debt but as an ongoing legal expense.
26% : As we know, it involves a $130,000 payment from former Trump fixer Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels right before the 2016 election to keep her quiet about an alleged affair she had with Trump a decade earlier.
25% : It's likely that none of this is going to matter because the New York legal system is so stacked against Trump.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Related articles
Copy link
CopyCopied
Powered by Social Snap