The Guardian Article Rating'I'm afraid': Texas butterfly sanctuary forced to close after far-right threats
- Bias Rating
-4% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
30% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
64% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "This week, the butterfly center was forced to close its doors indefinitely amid ongoing threats from far-right conspiracists and QAnon followers who falsely claim it is a haven for human-trafficking and illegal migration." | Positive | 34% Conservative |
| "The North American Butterfly Association (NABA), which runs the center, decided to close it down indefinitely on Wednesday as a precautionary measure, after being warned to be armed at all times or out of town during a We Stand America rally in support of a border wall." | Positive | 6% Conservative |
| "Treviño-Wright said the construction of sections of the border wall, and the subsequent vitriol that came from QAnon followers and Trump supporters, had a profound effect on the butterfly center and its staff." | Negative | -2% Liberal |
| "A court date for the case about the section of border wall on the center's property has not been set yet." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
| "Treviu00f1o-Wright said the construction of sections of the border wall, and the subsequent vitriol that came from QAnon followers and Trump supporters, had a profound effect on the butterfly center and its staff." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
| "Treviu00f1o-Wright and the NABA made headlines for suing the organizations behind the construction of a section of Donald Trump's border wall after they sought to build straight through the butterfly preserve." | Negative | -20% Liberal |
| "The nature preserve on the US-Mexico border became a target of rightwing ire after it opposed construction of Trump's wall" | Negative | -22% Liberal |
| "Those groups included We Build the Wall, led by Trump's former chief strategist Steve Baon and founder Brian Kolfage, which is now facing corruption and fraud charges." | Negative | -30% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
67% : This week, the butterfly center was forced to close its doors indefinitely amid ongoing threats from far-right conspiracists and QAnon followers who falsely claim it is a haven for human-trafficking and illegal migration.53% : The North American Butterfly Association (NABA), which runs the center, decided to close it down indefinitely on Wednesday as a precautionary measure, after being warned to "be armed at all times or out of town" during a We Stand America rally in support of a border wall.
49% : Treviño-Wright said the construction of sections of the border wall, and the subsequent vitriol that came from QAnon followers and Trump supporters, had a profound effect on the butterfly center and its staff.
45% : A court date for the case about the section of border wall on the center's property has not been set yet.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.