UPI Article RatingIndiana Supreme Court allows near-total abortion ban to take effect - UPI.com
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
8% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "Plaed Parenthood also argued that the anti-abortion law materially burdens a woman's exercise of this right." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
| "Today's decision is not the end of our fight for equitable, compassionate care in Indiana, or the patients in surrounding states who rely on Indiana for access to abortion." | Negative | -12% Liberal |
| "The court said the Indiana constitution's liberty protection does not cover the broad abortion right like Plaed Parenthood said it did." | Negative | -14% Liberal |
| "In a joint statement Indiana ACLU and Plaed Parenthood said, We are devastated by the Indiana Supreme Court's ruling today ..." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
| "Several abortion providers represented by the Indiana ACLU sued to invalidate Indiana's abortion law, contending that a woman's right to liberty under Article 1, Section 1 of the Indiana Constitution encompasses a fundamental right to abortion." | Negative | -20% Liberal |
| "In its opinion, the court said Plaed Parenthood failed to show that there are no circumstances in which any part of Senate Bill 1 could ever be enforced consistent with Article 1, Section 1." | Negative | -22% Liberal |
| "Now, patients will be forced either to flee the state to access abortion if they have the means, seek abortion outside of the health care system, or carry pregnancies against their will with profound medical risk and life-altering consequences." | Negative | -50% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : Planned Parenthood also argued that the anti-abortion law materially burdens a woman's exercise of this right.44% : Today's decision is not the end of our fight for equitable, compassionate care in Indiana, or the patients in surrounding states who rely on Indiana for access to abortion."
43% : The court said the Indiana constitution's "liberty" protection does not cover the broad abortion right like Planned Parenthood said it did.
41% : In a joint statement Indiana ACLU and Planned Parenthood said, "We are devastated by the Indiana Supreme Court's ruling today ...
40% : Several abortion providers represented by the Indiana ACLU sued to invalidate Indiana's abortion law, contending that a woman's right to "liberty" under Article 1, Section 1 of the Indiana Constitution encompasses a fundamental right to abortion.
39% : In its opinion, the court said Planned Parenthood failed to show that "there are no circumstances in which any part of Senate Bill 1 could ever be enforced consistent with Article 1, Section 1."
25% : Now, patients will be forced either to flee the state to access abortion if they have the means, seek abortion outside of the health care system, or carry pregnancies against their will with profound medical risk and life-altering consequences."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.