It's Well Past Time for Roe to Go | National Review

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% : Mississippi's brief is especially admirable because it takes square aim at each of the most common arguments in favor of Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, arguments that we hear often not only from abortion providers and abortion-rights activists, but also from the justices themselves.
48% : Interestingly, Blinken also pushed back against the narrative -- coming both from the Cuban government and from segments of the progressive movement in the U.S., including the Black Lives Matter movement -- that the U.S. is somehow responsible for the unrest in Cuba.
45% : Women deserve better than abortion, and the American people deserve better than a Supreme Court too obsessed with its own status and too afraid of controversy to correct one of the most unjust, anti-constitutional decisions in its history.
42% : Not only does Mississippi defend its ban on abortions after 15 weeks' gestation, but the brief opens by insisting that "nothing in constitutional text, structure, history, or tradition supports a right to abortion."
41% : The brief also confronts what is perhaps the Left's most popular argument for abortion, the so-called reliance-interest rationale offered by justices in Casey: that women in the U.S. have come to rely on legal abortion and will suffer significant harm, to the point of lacking basic equality, if Roe is overturned.
38% : The conclusion that abortion is a constitutional right has no basis in text, structure, history, or tradition.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.