- Bias Rating
-100% Extremely Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "The evidence supports an inference that President Trump, Plaintiff [Eastman], and several others entered into an agreement to defraud the United States by interfering with the election certification process, disseminating false information about election fraud, and pressuring state officials to alter state election results and federal officials to assist in that effort." | Negative | -16% Liberal |
| "Evidence and information available to the committee establishes a good-faith belief that Mr. Trump and others may have engaged in criminal and/or fraudulent acts, and that [Eastman's] legal assistance was used in furtherance of those activities, the committee's filing read." | Negative | -20% Liberal |
| "In the brief, the committee also argued that Trump was attempting to stop an official proceeding, i.e., Congress' counting of each state's electoral votes." | Negative | -22% Liberal |
| "So the committee responded by arguing that what Trump and he did was illegal." | Negative | -28% Liberal |
| "That is, Trump could face the same criminal charge prosecutors have used against around 240 insurrectionists." | Negative | -28% Liberal |
| "The Jan. 6 committee caot itself charge Trump and allies with crimes." | Negative | -28% Liberal |
| "The reason the brief was filed at all was thanks to Eastman, who became infamous as the professor who laid out a convoluted strategy for how Mike Pence could overturn the 2020 election -- a scheme the former vice president ignored, thanks in part to, of all people, Dan Quayle." | Negative | -30% Liberal |
| "The reason the brief was filed at all was thanks to Eastman, who became infamous as the professor who laid out a convoluted strategy for how Mike Pence could overturn the 2020 election -- a scheme the former vice president ignored, thanks in part to, of all people, Dan Quayle." | Negative | -30% Liberal |
| "For months, the House Select committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot have been patiently and meticulously amassing information about the lead-up to one of the darkest days in American history -- which they've done despite Donald Trump shoving key documents down the toilet." | Negative | -36% Liberal |
| "On top of that, the brief also accuses Trump of trying to obtain false election certificates." | Negative | -40% Liberal |
| "The evidence they've acquired over hundreds of interviews -- many done voluntarily by former Trump staffers -- strongly suggests that Trump, conservative lawyer John Eastman, and other allies broke numerous laws in an attempt to keep the former in power." | Negative | -56% Liberal |
| "The evidence they've acquired over hundreds of interviews -- many done voluntarily by former Trump staffers -- strongly suggests that Trump, conservative lawyer John Eastman, and other allies broke numerous laws in an attempt to keep the former in power." | Negative | -56% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
% :*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.