WSJ Article RatingJim Jordan Falling Short of Majority to Win Speaker Race in First Round
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
66% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "The members who voted against him were a mix of Republicans facing competitive races next year and longtime members who have seen Jordan clash with mainstream Republicans over the years." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
| "The gavel isn't final, but Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio) has currently failed to get the votes required to be elected speaker on the first ballot." | Negative | -20% Liberal |
| "Here are the Republicans who voted against him: Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska, Ken Buck of Colorado, Lori Chavez-DeRemer of Oregon, Anthony D'Esposito of New York, Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Jake Ellzey of Texas, Andrew Garbarino of New York, Carlos Gimenez of Florida, Tony Gonzales of Texas, Kay Granger of Texas, John James of Michigan, Mike Kelly of Pesylvania, Jeifer Kiggans of Virginia, Nick LaLota of New York, Doug LaMalfa of California, Michael Lawler of New York, John Rutherford of Florida, Michael Simpson of Idaho, Victoria Spartz of Indiana, Steve Womack of Arkansas." | Negative | -40% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
% :*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.