- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
36% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
12% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"Former State Assistant Attorney General Tristan Snell, who won New York's $25 million case against Trump, the largest ever at the time, said Tuesday night that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, House Oversight Committee Chairman Jim Comer, and U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, were either duped by Smirnov and the Kremlin -- or they were in on it.Alexander Smirnov, Politico reported Tuesday evening, is the former FBI informant charged with making up a multimillion-dollar bribery scheme involving President Joe Biden, his son Hunter and a Ukrainian energy company." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
"The former New York State prosecutor who led the successful investigation and prosecution of Donald Trump's Trump University is calling on the U.S. Dept. of Justice to act immediately to investigate communications from top congressional Republicans in light of Tuesday night's bombshell revelation that the FBI's former informant may have fed the Bureau false Kremlin-concocted propaganda attacking President Joe Biden and his son Hunter." | Negative | -34% Liberal |
"Former State Assistant Attorney General Tristan Snell, who won New York's $25 million case against Trump, the largest ever at the time, said Tuesday night that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, House Oversight Committee Chairman Jim Comer, and U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, were either duped by Smirnov and the Kremlin -- or they were in on it.Alexander Smirnov, Politico reported Tuesday evening, is the former FBI informant charged with making up a multimillion-dollar bribery scheme involving President Joe Biden, his son Hunter and a Ukrainian energy company." | Negative | -2% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : Former State Assistant Attorney General Tristan Snell, who won New York's $25 million case against Trump, the largest ever at the time, said Tuesday night that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, House Oversight Committee Chairman Jim Comer, and U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, "were either duped by Smirnov and the Kremlin -- or they were in on it."Alexander Smirnov, Politico reported Tuesday evening, is the "former FBI informant charged with making up a multimillion-dollar bribery scheme involving President Joe Biden, his son Hunter and a Ukrainian energy company."33% : The former New York State prosecutor who led the successful investigation and prosecution of Donald Trump's "Trump University" is calling on the U.S. Dept. of Justice to act "immediately" to investigate communications from top congressional Republicans in light of Tuesday night's bombshell revelation that the FBI's former informant may have fed the Bureau false Kremlin-concocted propaganda attacking President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.