Eagle-Tribune Article RatingJudge orders Texas to remove anti-migrant river buoys, rejects Abbott 'invasion' claim
- Bias Rating
Center
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
34% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "Several constitutional provisions assign the federal government -- not states -- the authority to recognize and respond to invasions, the judge wrote, and courts of appeals have uniformly declined to consider whether and when an 'invasion' occurs because of illegal immigration." | Positive | 26% Conservative |
| "Weeks later, he said he hopes the case gets to the highest court so the justices can formally recognize that states have leeway on immigration enforcement." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
| "Ezra, appointed by former President Ronald Reagan, said the case has to do with whether the buoys impede navigation on the Rio Grande, which the U.S. and Mexico share, and which serves as the international border for the length of Texas." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : "Several constitutional provisions assign the federal government -- not states -- the authority to recognize and respond to invasions," the judge wrote, and "courts of appeals have uniformly declined to consider whether and when an 'invasion' occurs because of illegal immigration."54% : Weeks later, he said he hopes the case gets to the highest court so the justices can formally recognize that states have leeway on immigration enforcement.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.