Justice Thomas rejects lawyer's rationale for using race in admissions for diversity: 'Don't put much stock' - 1010 WCSI
- Bias Rating
-18% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-18% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"A TIMELINE OF SUPREME COURT CASES ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS" | Positive | 18% Conservative |
"Those who support the use of affirmative action in college admissions cite multiple past Supreme Court precedents that say it is permissible." | Positive | 14% Conservative |
"JUSTICES HEAR ARGUMENTS OVER AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN HARVARD, UNC SUPREME COURT CASES" | Positive | 0% Conservative |
"In a later discussion with David Hinojosa, the director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Thomas seemed to reject the idea that affirmative action policies should continue simply because a school asserts there is a compelling interest in doing so." | Negative | -16% Liberal |
"NBC has cited four officials familiar with a phone call which took place in June, who revealed for the first time on Monday, Biden had barely finished telling Zelenskyy he'd just greenlighted another $1 billion in U.S. military assistance for Ukraine when Zelenskyy started listing all the additional help he needed and wasn't getting." | Positive | 6% Conservative |
"According to more from NBC, the two leaders' communications have since improved:Administration officials said Biden and Zelenskyy's relationship has only improved since the June phone call, after which Zelenskyy made a statement praising the U.S. for its generous assistance." | Positive | 4% Conservative |
"President Biden, reportedly showing his irritation, explained to Zelensky in that prior phone call, The American people were being quite generous, and his administration and the U.S. military were working hard to help Ukraine, he said, raising his voice, and Zelenskyy could show a little more gratitude." | Negative | -2% Liberal |
"The report followed by citing one source who said additionally that Biden was direct with Zelensky and reminded him that defense aid must be handled through the appropriate military chaels." | Negative | -6% Liberal |
"But the clash reflects Biden's early awareness that both congressional and public support for sending billions of dollars to Ukraine could begin to fade." | Negative | -26% Liberal |
"Days after the Pentagon aounced that total US military aid given to Ukraine so far has topped $18.5 billion, new reporting has revealed President Joe Biden briefly lost his temper in a phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky, after the latter kept pressing for more money and arms." | Negative | -32% Liberal |
"At that point, Biden lost his temper, the people familiar with the call said." | Negative | -32% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% :A TIMELINE OF SUPREME COURT CASES ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS57% : Those who support the use of affirmative action in college admissions cite multiple past Supreme Court precedents that say it is permissible.
50% :JUSTICES HEAR ARGUMENTS OVER AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN HARVARD, UNC SUPREME COURT CASES
42% : In a later discussion with David Hinojosa, the director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Thomas seemed to reject the idea that affirmative action policies should continue simply because a school asserts there is a compelling interest in doing so.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.