New Rwanda treaty on deportations in the works if judges rule against Government
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"David Jones, a former Cabinet minister, said: I would very much hope there would be recognition at last that there is no option but to legislate [to disapply the Act to illegal migration] and I hope that the Government would press on quickly with that.Downing Street has maintained that the Government can meet its pledge to stop the boats within its international obligations but will face a clamour from some 50 to 60 backbenchers to quit the ECHR if the Supreme Court rejects its case." | Positive | 0% Conservative |
"Adding nations to the safe country list alongside EU countries Switzerland and Albania would make it easier to reject asylum claims and return them to their homelands." | Negative | -14% Liberal |
"They proposed amending the Act with notwithstanding clauses that would direct British courts to ignore ECHR rulings in specific cases, such as when an illegal migrant requests to remain in the UK to preserve their right to family life." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
"The Illegal Migration Act disapplied section 3 of the Act and narrowed the grounds for migrants to challenge their deportation by requiring them to show they faced a risk of serious and irreversible harm." | Negative | -32% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : David Jones, a former Cabinet minister, said: "I would very much hope there would be recognition at last that there is no option but to legislate [to disapply the Act to illegal migration] and I hope that the Government would press on quickly with that."Downing Street has maintained that the Government can meet its pledge to stop the boats within its international obligations but will face a clamour from some 50 to 60 backbenchers to quit the ECHR if the Supreme Court rejects its case.43% : Adding nations to the "safe" country list alongside EU countries Switzerland and Albania would make it easier to reject asylum claims and return them to their homelands.
41% : They proposed amending the Act with "notwithstanding" clauses that would direct British courts to ignore ECHR rulings in specific cases, such as when an illegal migrant requests to remain in the UK to preserve their right to family life.
34% : The Illegal Migration Act disapplied section 3 of the Act and narrowed the grounds for migrants to challenge their deportation by requiring them to show they faced a risk of serious and irreversible harm.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.