New school boards challenge woke bureaucracy that leaves kids behind

View Original Article
Published Feb 12, 2024
Source Analysis Score
Help
The Source Analysis Score focuses on assessing the quality of sources and quotes used including their number, lengths, uniqueness, and diversity.
30% ReliableFair
Bias Rating
Help
The Bias Rating is computed based on a number of factors including bias loaded words, sentiments towards certain political policies, author bias towards politicians, and the amount of tone found in the article.

20% Somewhat Conservative

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Policy Leaning
Help
The policy leaning score is derived from author biases for or against a certain political policy, as found in articles.

20% Somewhat Conservative

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Politician Portrayal
Help
The politician leaning score is determined by the author's tone and leaning towards the specific politician mentioned in the article.

20% Negative

Overall Sentiment

-7% Negative

Opposite Viewpoint
Category

Reliability Score Analysis

The Reliability Score of the article is determined on a percentage score basis from 0 to 100%.

  • Opposite Sources as Poor for the lower number of sources with different viewpoints.
  • Unique Sources as Poor for the lower number of different sources.
  • Multiple Sources as Fair for an average number of total sources.
  • Multiple Quotes as Fair for an average number of quotes used in the article.
  • Quote Length as Poor for the lower number of words used in each quote.

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.


Policy Leaning Analysis

This article includes the following sentiments, providing an average bias score of 20% Conservative:

  • 1 positive sentiment for World Health Organization
  • 1 positive sentiment for LGBTQ Equality
  • 1 negative sentiment for Critical Race Theory
  • 1 negative sentiment for Systemic Racism


Politician Portrayal Analysis:

This article includes the following Politician Portrayal sentiments, providing an average sentiment of 20% Negative and bias score of 20% Conservative:

2 negative sentiments for Joe Biden


Policies:

World Health Organization
LGBTQ Equality
Systemic Racism
Critical Race Theory

Politicians:

Joe Biden

Sentiments

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
12% "NSBA promoted former Chief Transformational Officer Verjeana McCotter-Jacobs, Esq., into the role of CEO, touting her accomplishments in member services, equity, and social justice ..."
10% "As such, dissenting parents should be investigated under the Patriot Act by the FBI, Department of Justice, and Department of Homeland Security.""
-6% A report by Parents Defending Education later revealed that NSBA acted on behalf of Biden's Department of Education and colluded with the White House ..."
-8% "Before its precipitous fall, NSBA worked behind the scenes for decades, quietly steering the nation's school boards to preach social justice, institutional racism, sexual ..."
-14% Their political biases were exposed, however, in September 2021, when NSBA infamously requested that the Biden administration use the power of federal law enforcement ..."
-34% "In NSBA's own words, criticizing critical race theory and mask mandates during school board meetings could be considered acts of domestic terrorism.""

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : NSBA promoted former Chief Transformational Officer Verjeana McCotter-Jacobs, Esq., into the role of CEO, touting her accomplishments in "member services, equity, and social justice to identify discriminatory practices, prejudices, and beliefs in education policy."
55% : As such, dissenting parents should be investigated under the Patriot Act by the FBI, Department of Justice, and Department of Homeland Security.
46% : Before its precipitous fall, NSBA worked behind the scenes for decades, quietly steering the nation's school boards to preach social justice, institutional racism, sexual nonconformity, and the "equitable" redistribution of students' grades, while remaining conspicuously unconcerned about student performance.
33% : In NSBA's own words, criticizing critical race theory and mask mandates during school board meetings could be considered acts of domestic terrorism.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link