Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer Article RatingOhio rejects proposal that would have made it tougher to protect abortion rights
- Bias Rating
38% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
48% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
10% Positive
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "GOP lawmakers had cited possible future amendments related to gun control, minimum wage increases and more as reasons a higher threshold should be required." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
| "It would establish a fundamental right to reproductive freedom with reasonable limits.Voters in several states have approved ballot questions protecting access to abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, but typically have done so with less than 60" | Negative | -10% Liberal |
| "AP VoteCast polling last year found that 59" | Negative | -14% Liberal |
| "In a statement, Republican House Speaker Jason Stephens advised supporters to move past Tuesday's results to focus on trying to defeat the abortion rights measure: The people of Ohio have spoken.While abortion was not directly on the special election ballot, the result marks the latest setback for Republicans in a conservative-leaning state who favor imposing tough restrictions on the procedure." | Negative | -24% Liberal |
| "In fact, in early returns, support for the measure fell far short of former President Donald Trump's performance during the 2020 election in nearly every county." | Positive | 6% Conservative |
| "President Joe Biden hailed Tuesday's result, releasing a statement saying: This measure was a blatant attempt to weaken voters' voices and further erode the freedom of women to make their own health care decisions." | Positive | 4% Conservative |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : GOP lawmakers had cited possible future amendments related to gun control, minimum wage increases and more as reasons a higher threshold should be required.45% : It would establish "a fundamental right to reproductive freedom" with "reasonable limits."Voters in several states have approved ballot questions protecting access to abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, but typically have done so with less than 60% of the vote.
43% : AP VoteCast polling last year found that 59% of Ohio voters say abortion should generally be legal.
38% : In a statement, Republican House Speaker Jason Stephens advised supporters to move past Tuesday's results to focus on trying to defeat the abortion rights measure: "The people of Ohio have spoken."While abortion was not directly on the special election ballot, the result marks the latest setback for Republicans in a conservative-leaning state who favor imposing tough restrictions on the procedure.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.