Washington Post Article RatingOpinion | George Santos? Finish him!
- Bias Rating
-80% Extremely Liberal
- Reliability
50% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "Finally, Santos has been convinced not to run for reelection in 2024 -- or so he says -- but Ruth Marcus considers that recourse insufficient." | Negative | -22% Liberal |
| "George makes an impassioned case that while the prison practice is (sadly) not unusual, it certainly qualifies as cruel." | Negative | -24% Liberal |
| "Expulsion from the House is a drastic step, Ruth writes, and she worried earlier in the collating of Santos's sordid conduct that it would set a dangerous precedent of removal for purely political reasons." | Negative | -38% Liberal |
| "She concludes that Santos must be expelled as soon as possible." | Negative | -42% Liberal |
| "Cartoon by Edith Pritchett: A chart of George Santos's campaign fundsTo hear Santos describe it, that's exactly what the House Ethics Committee did with its report on another tranche of misdeeds by the mendacious New York rep who, for a time, despite all the lies, seemed indestructible." | Negative | -52% Liberal |
| "Cartoon by Edith Pritchett: A chart of George Santos's campaign fundsTo hear Santos describe it, that's exactly what the House Ethics Committee did with its report on another tranche of misdeeds by the mendacious New York rep who, for a time, despite all the lies, seemed indestructible." | Negative | -52% Liberal |
| "It calls to mind the 1856 beatdown of Charles Sumner by Preston Brooks, and do you know what happened to the country after that?" | Negative | -66% Liberal |
| "It calls to mind the 1856 beatdown of Charles Sumner by Preston Brooks, and do you know what happened to the country after that?" | Negative | -66% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
% :*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.