Previous Troubling Reports

Concision and Coverage bias are very evident in this article, as it selectively focuses on outbound migration from blue states. While it shows that California and New York are losing residents as well as taxable income, it leaves out the many blue states including New York and California are steady in terms of GDP and federal tax revenue. It also implies that taxes are the complete cause of migration, when in reality that isn't necessarily true. While I'm sure taxes are a factor for migration among states, high taxes alone don't explain all migration trends.

This misinformation comes from the claim that Maryland was sending out "illegal mail-in ballots" or that widespread voter fraud was occurring. In reality, Maryland election officials explained that some ballots were reissued because of a printing vendor error, meaning that voters received corrected ballots.

An Editor’s Note on the NYT on an AI-generated quote summary attributed to a Canadian politician. The NYT update it with the real speech, the fact this even happened at all with a reputable source like the NYT is deeply concerning and shows a lack of proepr research and factchecking being done at all stages.

This article is built on a bunch of half truths. First, the article claims Governor Hochul broke her promise to not raise taxes. She has supported tax increases on the wealthy her entire career, which are the only new taxes in New York. There's no evidence to suggest she increased taxes on people making under 500,000, which is the group she promised not to raise taxes for. Also, the article mentions how Mamdani "barely" broke 50 percent, and how that doesn't give him a mandate to lead. First, over 50 percent quite literally is a majority, no matter how close. second, he was in a unique race where there were three legitimate candidates instead of two and third, he won by a higher percentage than President Trump did, who won 49.8 percent of the vote, but you don't see NewsMax say that Trump doesn't have a mandate. Lastly, although this is just about labels, Governor Hochul has never identified as a socialist, and doesn't support many Democratic Socialist policies that Mamdani does. They're likely callinger her socialist as a form of criticism, but it's still wrong.

This article really misrepresents what Mayor Mamdani said. He said that he holds the final decision in all matters, not just the police department. He is actively working WITH the police department on finding ways to make reforms while keeping everyone safe. Mamdani will only override the police department if there's a deadline, citing his "responsibility" to keep the city running. The article title makes him sound like he wants to be a dictator, but in reality he just wants to avoid deadlocks.

Trump wasn't slurring his speech. Slurring is speaking words indistinctly so that sounds run into one another. Trump misspoke some words, but he wasn't slurring at all in the clip by definition, so this is misinformation through misrepresentation.

This article provides a fundamentally flawed view of the Supreme Court's decision. They act as if every justice is just ok with conversion therapy. The decision doesn't even "end" bans on conversion therapy. The decision sends the case back down to the lower courts. The Supreme Court determined that the wrong level of scrutiny was used by lower courts, making it effectively impossible to rule on the case. The article pressed the panic button without actually considering what the decision means.

They bring up the idea that Druski got a cease-and-desist from Erika Kirk by mentioning Twitter users but say it's unsubstantiated. That being said, even mentioning that it's unsubstantiated could still spread the false news that it did happen, even though there hasn't been any direct proof of it.

This article uses clips on ICE agents in airports to make it seem like they aren't doing anything. ICE agents are entitled to lunch breaks like everyone else. NFR reports that ICE agents are assisting with line management and checking documents.

This article tries to create a consensus amongst Republicans that they want Iran to pay for the war. However, they are using the quotes of one republican. They don't mention Republican opposition to the war until the end. Along with that, they don't mention other Republican ideas about how to pay for the war with Iran.

This article is misleading for a couple reasons. First, it ignores the part of Trump's statement where he says that increased gas prices are only happening because of war with Iran and second, none of his "allies" have made public statements endorsing Trump's truth social post. It attempts to create a consensus while also misrepresenting Trump's statement.

This article is overall extremely biased. It paints former Secretary Noem in an extremely negative light. The two biggest biases shown are that it omits that a lot of Noem's actions were supported by the President and that many DHS secretaries have taken similar actions. It makes unsupported claims about her popularity. Although reliable numbers on the approval of secretaries can be hard to find, the latest one from 2025 showed she had large support amongst Republicans, and although way less popular with Democrats and non-committed voters, still wasn't the least popular. A few tweets isn't evidence.