Fortune Magazine Article RatingRetiring baby boomers are getting wiped out by inflation and a volatile stock market
- Bias Rating
-6% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "The natural extension of this wisdom is that pre-retirees and retirees should rely on other sources of income to get them through until the market recovers -- the most common go-to source being Social Security." | Positive | 10% Conservative |
| "Kurinec, for instance, recommends his clients build an on-ramp into retirement using a year or two of savings, rather than relying on Social Security or withdrawals from investments." | Positive | 10% Conservative |
| "A savings account balance isn't going to net investors a ton of return, but using these funds now instead of dipping into retirement accounts means that those investments will have a better chance of recovering and you can hold off on claiming Social Security." | Positive | 4% Conservative |
| "By claiming Social Security early, they are likely forfeiting the promised growth built into Social Security from each year of delay." | Negative | -8% Liberal |
| "But if that means claiming Social Security early (full retirement age is 66 or 67 for most baby boomers), Rothstein says it could be a bad bet." | Negative | -30% Liberal |
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : The natural extension of this wisdom is that pre-retirees and retirees should rely on other sources of income to get them through until the market recovers -- the most common go-to source being Social Security.55% :Kurinec, for instance, recommends his clients build an on-ramp into retirement using a year or two of savings, rather than relying on Social Security or withdrawals from investments.
52% : A savings account balance isn't going to net investors a ton of return, but using these funds now instead of dipping into retirement accounts means that those investments will have a better chance of recovering and you can hold off on claiming Social Security.
46% : "By claiming Social Security early, they are likely forfeiting the promised growth built into Social Security from each year of delay.
35% : But if that means claiming Social Security early (full retirement age is 66 or 67 for most baby boomers), Rothstein says it could be a bad bet.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.