Talk Business & Politics Article RatingSCOTUS narrows EPA authority on waterways - Talk Business & Politics
- Bias Rating
52% Very Conservative
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
74% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "In a landmark 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday (May 25) has stripped away regulatory powers from the Environmental Protection Agency when it comes to pollution control in U.S. waterways." | Positive | 6% Conservative |
| "The Supreme Court's disappointing decision in Sackett v. EPA will take our country backwards." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
| "Landowners in the case Sackett v. EPA had argued the EPA's powers to regulate wetlands were too broad and could criminalize many landowners who didn't understand or couldn't comply with the burdensome regulations." | Negative | -20% Liberal |
| "The decision is being hailed as a win for property rights advocates while being touted as a blow to environmental protection efforts." | Negative | -22% Liberal |
| "U.S. Rep. Rick Crawford, R-Jonesboro praised the court's ruling, which has major ramifications for agricultural land across Arkansas." | Positive | 12% Conservative |
| "It is now time for the Biden Administration to repeal its latest WOTUS rule that is in plain opposition to the Court's decision and continues the EPA's efforts to control the private property rights of rural Americans, Crawford said." | Negative | -8% Liberal |
| "It puts our Nation's wetlands - and the rivers, streams, lakes, and ponds coected to them - at risk of pollution and destruction, jeopardizing the sources of clean water that millions of American families, farmers, and businesses rely on, Biden said." | Negative | -24% Liberal |
| "President Joe Biden disagreed with the ruling and warned of its ramifications." | Negative | -30% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : In a landmark 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday (May 25) has stripped away regulatory powers from the Environmental Protection Agency when it comes to pollution control in U.S. waterways.41% :"The Supreme Court's disappointing decision in Sackett v. EPA will take our country backwards.
40% : Landowners in the case Sackett v. EPA had argued the EPA's powers to regulate wetlands were too broad and could criminalize many landowners who didn't understand or couldn't comply with the burdensome regulations.
39% : The decision is being hailed as a win for property rights advocates while being touted as a blow to environmental protection efforts.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.