Special counsel goes directly to Supreme Court to resolve whether Trump has immunity from prosecution
- Bias Rating
-64% Very Liberal
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-32% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
96% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
6% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"It is of imperative public importance that respondent's claims of immunity be resolved by this Court and that respondent's trial proceed as promptly as possible if his claim of immunity is rejected." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
"A cornerstone of our constitutional order is that no person is above the law, Smith's team wrote." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
"In their appeal to the Supreme Court, prosecutors with the special counsel wrote that nothing could be more vital to our democracy than holding a former president accountable if they break the law." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : "It is of imperative public importance that respondent's claims of immunity be resolved by this Court and that respondent's trial proceed as promptly as possible if his claim of immunity is rejected.48% : "A cornerstone of our constitutional order is that no person is above the law," Smith's team wrote.
41% : In their appeal to the Supreme Court, prosecutors with the special counsel wrote that "nothing could be more vital to our democracy" than holding a former president accountable if they break the law.
30% : (CNN) -- Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to decide whether Donald Trump has any immunity from criminal prosecution for alleged crimes he committed while in office - the first time that the high court will weigh in on the historic prosecution of the former president.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.