Suella Braverman says 'further action needed' after pro-Palestine march
- Bias Rating
-28% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-28% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"The peer - who was nominated by Boris Johnson in 2021 to lead a review- said there had been an explosion in anti-semitic incidents linked to the marches and that he would be looking at the threshold for the police to ban [them]." | Positive | 14% Conservative |
"An official UK Government review is arguing for a change in the law so that police can ban pro-Palestinian marches." | Negative | -16% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : The peer - who was nominated by Boris Johnson in 2021 to lead a review- said there had been an "explosion" in anti-semitic incidents linked to the marches and that he would be "looking at the threshold for the police to ban [them]".42% : "An official UK Government review is arguing for a change in the law so that police can ban pro-Palestinian marches.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.